From e6b1edb195a29c5c6b1f9689dd625a09271089d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sufyaan Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 06:50:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] completing sentence --- blog/keep-it-simple/index.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/keep-it-simple/index.html b/blog/keep-it-simple/index.html index c5b1610..80e21eb 100644 --- a/blog/keep-it-simple/index.html +++ b/blog/keep-it-simple/index.html @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  • Contributes to the world

    • Let's expand on the first and second points. Why is minimal software so easy to maintain? Why do developers hate being developers when they are working with bloated pieces of software? Keeping software minimal gives developers the opportunity to easily find code that is slowing down the whole program or is inefficient. It also helps developers find bugs easy. This is because a smaller codebase means that it takes less time to review the code. A group of 10 people can easily perfect a program whose codebase is less than 1500 lines. After that, it is just a work of maintaining the program and making sure that any requests that users have are answered.

    -

    Minimal software runs fast on all devices. It is simply no contest. A 1000-line Python program is going to be much faster than a 100K-line C program even though C is much faster than Python. Inefficiencies and lackluster execution of functions in a program can be spotted much more easily in a smaller program. There is a huge disregard for old computers. People simply cannot use old computers anymore because the software that they use is so inefficient that their computer struggles to do basic things. For example, they use Adobe Reader to open PDFs which is one of the worst things to do. Adobe Reader takes an incredibly long time to open considering the fact that they are the ones that invented PDFs. Another example is Word. Why does Word take long to open and write on? It's code is bloated. Think of Zathura. It is a PDF viewer that follows the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing well. Even on the slowest of computers, Zathura takes milliseconds to open a PDF. Think about LaTeX. You do the writing then you compile the document into a PDF. It does everything from linking, referencing, bibliographies much better than Word. In fact, it is so good that many universities require its use f

    +

    Minimal software runs fast on all devices. It is simply no contest. A 1000-line Python program is going to be much faster than a 100K-line C program even though C is much faster than Python. Inefficiencies and lackluster execution of functions in a program can be spotted much more easily in a smaller program. There is a huge disregard for old computers. People simply cannot use old computers anymore because the software that they use is so inefficient that their computer struggles to do basic things. For example, they use Adobe Reader to open PDFs which is one of the worst things to do. Adobe Reader takes an incredibly long time to open considering the fact that they are the ones that invented PDFs. Another example is Word. Why does Word take long to open and write on? It's code is bloated. Think of Zathura. It is a PDF viewer that follows the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing well. Even on the slowest of computers, Zathura takes milliseconds to open a PDF. Think about LaTeX. You do the writing then you compile the document into a PDF. It does everything from linking, referencing, bibliographies much better than Word. In fact, it is so good that many universities require its use for proper formatting and referencing.

    Minimal software can be extensible as per the UNIX philosophy. Instead of creating a massive program that tries to do everything, minimalist programs create modules for certain functions. This makes troubleshooting a piece of cake as the initial confusion of finding out what exactly causes the error is practically eliminated. For example, if you are making a login page and the authentication does not work, you know that you should look in the authentication module. However, if you make it all in a single program, it is difficult to root out whether an issue is due to an incorrect variable type or a redundant function.

    All of this helps developers to avoid complications. No team wants another error or speed complaint in the middle of another issue. All of the advantages listed thus far help developers have peace of mind.

    Finally, minimal pieces of software can be liberated and made into free software to contribute to the world. Once the initial stages of bug-fixing and optimization is over, it is just a matter of letting the world find ways to make the program better. An inefficiency that no one would spot otherwise can be ironed out by a top-tier programmer who worked in a plethora of huge companies with decades of experience. It also helps budding developers learn about development.